Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 03:47:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E82EE15DF5FCB0E676091C67D1FD0E507F034711E8DD75B3480C39EACADAE3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN It is a valid argument for debate that accepting significant funding from someone w/ a public political record on the conflict affiliates the organization w/ the donor. That they have no explicit position is irrelevant to this argument.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747460675608465914
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E82EE15DF5FCB0E676091C67D1FD0E507F034711E8DD75B3480C39EACADAE3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705463272080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17474606756084659143E82EE15DF5FCB0E676091C67D1FD0E507F034711E8DD75B3480C39EACADAE3F