Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 23:30:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 783DBB0ED0E2F059527124EEBBCF5CD6A3118B8E0C8760397EF99286C64A121C
Participant Details

Original Note:

7 of 11 judges voted to reject the request, with 4 of 11 dissenting. None of the 11 voted to rehear the motion. This is a win for Smith. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/16/appeals-court-rejects-x-challenge-to-secret-demand-for-trump-twitter-data.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747392034460041521
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 783DBB0ED0E2F059527124EEBBCF5CD6A3118B8E0C8760397EF99286C64A121C
  • createdAtMillis - 1705447816147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747392034460041521783DBB0ED0E2F059527124EEBBCF5CD6A3118B8E0C8760397EF99286C64A121C