Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 02:24:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B3AD7EBDFF2E8F0CFDFE4E6A8B2BBE41E9950DAC47B7385B0AB5F9D415F5101
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Para hacer una crítica al periódico por su clara falta de rigurosidad se puede responder al post, no es necesaria una nota porque no se está desinformando en nada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747371155621626241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B3AD7EBDFF2E8F0CFDFE4E6A8B2BBE41E9950DAC47B7385B0AB5F9D415F5101
  • createdAtMillis - 1705458270236
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17473711556216262419B3AD7EBDFF2E8F0CFDFE4E6A8B2BBE41E9950DAC47B7385B0AB5F9D415F5101