Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 22:04:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85C8D15C88A66755B09CDFE207B4B1765529C0CEE3833D4773746BBA0339D2A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Oh the irony of proposing a CN proving you did zero research, when someone else did research, but proves the OP is factual. When posts are factual there isn't any reason to CN them. The CN offers no additional context and only proves the OP. NNN https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747347213670367627
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85C8D15C88A66755B09CDFE207B4B1765529C0CEE3833D4773746BBA0339D2A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1705442641063
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174734721367036762785C8D15C88A66755B09CDFE207B4B1765529C0CEE3833D4773746BBA0339D2A1