Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 05:02:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083
Participant Details

Original Note:

Oh the irony of proposing a CN proving you did zero research, when someone else did research, but proves the OP is factual. When posts are factual there isn't any reason to CN them. The CN offers no additional context and only proves the OP. NNN https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747347213670367627
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083
  • createdAtMillis - 1705467749403
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174734721367036762771DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083