Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 23:08:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22FE7EC031FB205233781D7AE6DF47C443730020ADE21D421E88B233A006A9C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Oh the irony of proposing a CN proving you did zero research, when someone else did research, but proves the OP is factual. When posts are factual there isn't any reason to CN them. The CN offers no additional context and only proves the OP. NNN https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747347213670367627
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22FE7EC031FB205233781D7AE6DF47C443730020ADE21D421E88B233A006A9C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1705446500067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174734721367036762722FE7EC031FB205233781D7AE6DF47C443730020ADE21D421E88B233A006A9C1