Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 07:49:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6E54E3411C926B39F5E804D465DCF954E493E1001C95B640B17036BEE8C546A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Negative Informationen können subjektiv als “Schmutzkampagne” interpretiert werden, abhängig von individuellen Erwartungen und Erfahrungen. Die Interpretation variiert jedoch stark je nach Perspektive und stellt keine objektive Wahrheit dar. https://www.studysmarter.de/schule/psychologie/grundlagendisziplinen-der-psychologie/wahrnehmungsprozess/ https://lehrbuch-psychologie.springer.com/sites/default/files/2021-09/Leseprobe_Bak_2020.pdf https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-61775-5_2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1747310606577696800
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F6E54E3411C926B39F5E804D465DCF954E493E1001C95B640B17036BEE8C546A
createdAtMillis - 1705477766179
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1747310606577696800F6E54E3411C926B39F5E804D465DCF954E493E1001C95B640B17036BEE8C546A