Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 14:16:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C8011280701520956D2C0E0F0A084BEA5B862189C785D8BB1FE7144ED43A9C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The research was done from 1993 to 1995, although the article was published in 2004. They removed all homosexual relations, except for a few which were "important for the observer structure of the graph." https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/386272

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747260142532604124
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C8011280701520956D2C0E0F0A084BEA5B862189C785D8BB1FE7144ED43A9C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1705414587023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17472601425326041248C8011280701520956D2C0E0F0A084BEA5B862189C785D8BB1FE7144ED43A9C6