Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 09:16:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6E5B1A66A79BDCDA8A9265965A2A8D828CDF3E2577224AC615AD04C7D9323F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the total cost/benefit of the royal family is irrelevant to the cost of the official portrait in the article. In addition, misleading re: sovereign grant being decreased as it is set to increase significantly over the next two years https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/20/king-charles-to-receive-huge-pay-rise-from-uk-taxpayers

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747240439655157996
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6E5B1A66A79BDCDA8A9265965A2A8D828CDF3E2577224AC615AD04C7D9323F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1705482967528
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747240439655157996A6E5B1A66A79BDCDA8A9265965A2A8D828CDF3E2577224AC615AD04C7D9323F3