Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 19:59:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21F523B03B2E8136EB990DE0E4EF38677F477B7D666DDDEFE5DB5C2C849D5C22
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The distinction in the other note is negligible in context. This potential future case is being handled by the same lawyers as the current one against Israel, and thus is part of the process for South Africa to file a case. Interview with van Rensberg (video): https://www.memri.org/tv/south-africa-attorney-wikus-van-rensberg-israel-icj-precursor-united-states-britain

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747040432628920510
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21F523B03B2E8136EB990DE0E4EF38677F477B7D666DDDEFE5DB5C2C849D5C22
  • createdAtMillis - 1705435168497
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174704043262892051021F523B03B2E8136EB990DE0E4EF38677F477B7D666DDDEFE5DB5C2C849D5C22