Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 21:52:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC9641AE3CFD02504010FA4936D0BB412F481E2FFE7C4753A2DE0C3E66D4D97F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. El tweet muestra el lado de la historia del autor, que se puede tratar como “opinión personal”. El caso está en manos de un Tribunal y desde entonces, la resolución judicial mandará sobre cualquier “Nota de la Comunidad”.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747005856795804071
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC9641AE3CFD02504010FA4936D0BB412F481E2FFE7C4753A2DE0C3E66D4D97F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705355548493
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747005856795804071EC9641AE3CFD02504010FA4936D0BB412F481E2FFE7C4753A2DE0C3E66D4D97F