Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 23:17:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C66B3209399EBA532378A6DDAEC7E75BD2D57916F41A3D0BD067C3DC16CAB14B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. El tweet muestra el lado de la historia del autor, que se puede tratar como “opinión personal”. El caso está en manos de un Tribunal y desde entonces, la resolución judicial mandará sobre cualquier “Nota de la Comunidad”.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747005856795804071
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C66B3209399EBA532378A6DDAEC7E75BD2D57916F41A3D0BD067C3DC16CAB14B
  • createdAtMillis - 1705360654429
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747005856795804071C66B3209399EBA532378A6DDAEC7E75BD2D57916F41A3D0BD067C3DC16CAB14B