Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 13:32:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01016E87F89A0AED4AAD1117C86C9F2FF4E63EE125DA46120B078ADEC9F0405F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. El tweet muestra el lado de la historia del autor, que se puede tratar como “opinión personal”. El caso está en manos de un Tribunal y desde entonces, la resolución judicial mandará sobre cualquier “Nota de la Comunidad”.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747005856795804071
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01016E87F89A0AED4AAD1117C86C9F2FF4E63EE125DA46120B078ADEC9F0405F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705411940191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174700585679580407101016E87F89A0AED4AAD1117C86C9F2FF4E63EE125DA46120B078ADEC9F0405F