Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 18:56:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Appears to be” is speculation. There needs to be clear confirmation. https://www.historyextra.com/period/general-history/history-fact-checking/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746958793710154170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B
  • createdAtMillis - 1705345017448
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17469587937101541704ABE6203F10279A89C2A3C09E70B746A68D327698E0FC5F06B79365FFE86469B