Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 23:54:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40AD267E7D1B40FFAC2129B33CE64D2241A54AE72EDC2C163628805B2B21CDBB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN To refute claims in a cited paper, use the relevant articles or else comment elsewhere, not in community notes, especially if the research is accurately represented which it was. Here is one of the sevral sources he cited: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37650258/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746952534130892828
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40AD267E7D1B40FFAC2129B33CE64D2241A54AE72EDC2C163628805B2B21CDBB
  • createdAtMillis - 1707263670434
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174695253413089282840AD267E7D1B40FFAC2129B33CE64D2241A54AE72EDC2C163628805B2B21CDBB