Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 18:19:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, the tweet does not claim that this has never happened before. If you want to argue against the relevance of the post, do so in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746944232214950328
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1705342785434
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746944232214950328F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5