Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 00:38:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E186E0F5C1572FF23753F79E4913D8BC4E953D7C0DC4F431B4A10FA0035422CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, the tweet does not claim that this has never happened before. If you want to argue against the relevance of the post, do so in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746944232214950328
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E186E0F5C1572FF23753F79E4913D8BC4E953D7C0DC4F431B4A10FA0035422CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1705365539363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746944232214950328E186E0F5C1572FF23753F79E4913D8BC4E953D7C0DC4F431B4A10FA0035422CB