Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 14:22:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B6DAE711563C13FD624E2DEB71E0F147C33DDF060B774C1A6C3BCF542D366785
Participant Details

Original Note:

The graphic comes from the anonymous account x.com/prognosumfragen (Prognos polls). It is unclear how the data were collected and how the results were obtained. Prognos polls do not meet the minimum standards of transparency in opinion research. https://www-presseportal-de.translate.goog/pm/133833/4333731?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp https://www.br.de/nachrichten/netzwelt/experten-warnen-vor-verbreitung-der-zahlen-von-prognosumfragen-faktenfuchs https://www.prognos.com/de/twitter-account-prognosumfragen-distanzierung Reliable survey results can be found here: x.com/Wahlrecht_de

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746873069463834763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B6DAE711563C13FD624E2DEB71E0F147C33DDF060B774C1A6C3BCF542D366785
  • createdAtMillis - 1705328536989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1746873069463834763B6DAE711563C13FD624E2DEB71E0F147C33DDF060B774C1A6C3BCF542D366785