Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 17:03:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37DDB174A3543DC335085A8851A2D41A1C06F263BD12F06C6E862023E40416C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The graphic comes from the anonymous account x.com/prognosumfragen (Prognos polls). It is unclear how the data were collected and how the results were obtained. Prognos polls do not meet the minimum standards of transparency in opinion research. https://www-presseportal-de.translate.goog/pm/133833/4333731?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp https://www.br.de/nachrichten/netzwelt/experten-warnen-vor-verbreitung-der-zahlen-von-prognosumfragen-faktenfuchs https://www.prognos.com/de/twitter-account-prognosumfragen-distanzierung Reliable survey results can be found here: x.com/Wahlrecht_de

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746873069463834763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37DDB174A3543DC335085A8851A2D41A1C06F263BD12F06C6E862023E40416C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1705338189647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174687306946383476337DDB174A3543DC335085A8851A2D41A1C06F263BD12F06C6E862023E40416C4