Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 13:19:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E931C0B0A0FEE492D642607A77EF669D4C8E397E32552C974C678FFD6146F5A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Clinton case, brought by Judicial Watch, concerned taped interviews between the President and a historian. It never went to SCOTUS. https://casetext.com/case/judicial-watch-inc-v-natl-archives-records-admin Furthermore, the decision passed down was that the tapes were personal records whereas the documents Trump took were official / classified https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/06/23/clinton-sock-case-not-relevant-to-trumps-classified-docs-case-experts-say/70325388007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746870994155741573
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E931C0B0A0FEE492D642607A77EF669D4C8E397E32552C974C678FFD6146F5A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1705324795509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746870994155741573E931C0B0A0FEE492D642607A77EF669D4C8E397E32552C974C678FFD6146F5A7