Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 04:24:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E691C922892DE69311933F1F3D0297856DA001011C17908F4ACA6B6EC0E979CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false as the case has not even gone trough the oral arguments phase according to official SCOTUS blog website: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/trump-v-anderson/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746734884339540173
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E691C922892DE69311933F1F3D0297856DA001011C17908F4ACA6B6EC0E979CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1705292643677
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746734884339540173E691C922892DE69311933F1F3D0297856DA001011C17908F4ACA6B6EC0E979CA