Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 04:11:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46C01C6FA78C14AE26FBBD8352328879B0C5D6988D3FEDA7F134AD5F33C51B25
Participant Details

Original Note:

D'une part, la source de l'étude indiquée en commentaire ne correspond pas au tweet. D'autre part, l'étude sur les intentions de votes aux européennes ne donnent pas ces chiffres : https://elabe.fr/elections-europeennes-2024-1/ Il s'agit donc très certainement d'un tweet trompeur pour manipuler l'opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746670176722932073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46C01C6FA78C14AE26FBBD8352328879B0C5D6988D3FEDA7F134AD5F33C51B25
  • createdAtMillis - 1705291903622
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174667017672293207346C01C6FA78C14AE26FBBD8352328879B0C5D6988D3FEDA7F134AD5F33C51B25