Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 22:28:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB62A82DF67EB3403C2670EAFED8A3C5F4566D2E71469D908BC05AB5241EF775
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study concerned, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/10/1621 is in a very low impact predatory journal. It is based on questionnaires, and does not report other than expected temporally effects of a vaccination, most not even statistically different.Large studies show no safety concerns: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00054-8/fulltext https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784015

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1746659976364388408
participantId -
raterParticipantId - BB62A82DF67EB3403C2670EAFED8A3C5F4566D2E71469D908BC05AB5241EF775
createdAtMillis - 1705271326599
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1746659976364388408BB62A82DF67EB3403C2670EAFED8A3C5F4566D2E71469D908BC05AB5241EF775