Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 00:17:38 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FEA3C67C5D368642B895208E8339648EA9ABC6C0DF713F9B9A5FC930A1F94EF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The choice of Washington Journal's decision to exclude a candidate who is very popular while surprising is their editorial choice and not a statement of fact that needs rectification.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746648784514208024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FEA3C67C5D368642B895208E8339648EA9ABC6C0DF713F9B9A5FC930A1F94EF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1705277858140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746648784514208024FEA3C67C5D368642B895208E8339648EA9ABC6C0DF713F9B9A5FC930A1F94EF8