Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 05:34:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A21BBE22700946D7ED03C406E6280516945FA34549DF810FD6AB919F1B227E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

‪Donc l’AFP choisit les experts qui conviennent à son narratif et exclue les autres sources d’information qui appuient l’efficacité du traitement HAZ‬ ‪Sur quelles bases scientifiques l’AFP opère t elle son choix ? ‬ ‪http://earlyC19.com‬

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746632245803118920
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A21BBE22700946D7ED03C406E6280516945FA34549DF810FD6AB919F1B227E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1705383269381
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17466322458031189200A21BBE22700946D7ED03C406E6280516945FA34549DF810FD6AB919F1B227E0