Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 13:23:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 660D688A5A5F8D618D0AE521418DCADB5B30B1E3307FA3417709874993F8A90B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zijn carrière als advocaat werd overschaduwd door beschuldigingen van informatie lekken en omkoping, waarvoor hij later werd vrijgesproken wegens gebrek aan ondersteunend bewijs. https://www.rechtspraak.nl/Organisatie-en-contact/Organisatie/Rechtbanken/Rechtbank-Midden-Nederland/Nieuws/Paginas/Publicaties-over-lekkende-advocaat-door-AD-en-talkshowgast-deels-onjuist.aspx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746586726607261966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 660D688A5A5F8D618D0AE521418DCADB5B30B1E3307FA3417709874993F8A90B
  • createdAtMillis - 1705325031202
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1746586726607261966660D688A5A5F8D618D0AE521418DCADB5B30B1E3307FA3417709874993F8A90B