Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 14:26:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zijn carrière als advocaat werd overschaduwd door beschuldigingen van informatie lekken en omkoping, waarvoor hij later werd vrijgesproken wegens gebrek aan ondersteunend bewijs. https://www.rechtspraak.nl/Organisatie-en-contact/Organisatie/Rechtbanken/Rechtbank-Midden-Nederland/Nieuws/Paginas/Publicaties-over-lekkende-advocaat-door-AD-en-talkshowgast-deels-onjuist.aspx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1746586726607261966
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 64C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E
createdAtMillis - 1705328766014
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 174658672660726196664C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E