Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 17:06:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FFA9C3ECCAF5E95F0FAA724C2C3D285E125AA558C3FA514F03BBF2E8C8DE480B
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the US the 1st Amendment protects speech that some wish Law Enforcement would respond and "put an end to" Unless the speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” AND “likely to incite or produce such action" it is legal despite some's wishes https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brandenburg_test https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/ https://www.acluohio.org/en/cases/brandenburg-v-ohio-395-us-444-1969

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746497173334729106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FFA9C3ECCAF5E95F0FAA724C2C3D285E125AA558C3FA514F03BBF2E8C8DE480B
  • createdAtMillis - 1705252014583
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1746497173334729106FFA9C3ECCAF5E95F0FAA724C2C3D285E125AA558C3FA514F03BBF2E8C8DE480B