Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 21:41:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E21A0646462B80E0542D7029CEDD233B68FD3A20A4FA45A7074939FA0C1142B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the US the 1st Amendment protects speech that some wish Law Enforcement would respond and "put an end to" Unless the speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” AND “likely to incite or produce such action" it is legal despite some's wishes https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brandenburg_test https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/ https://www.acluohio.org/en/cases/brandenburg-v-ohio-395-us-444-1969

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746497173334729106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E21A0646462B80E0542D7029CEDD233B68FD3A20A4FA45A7074939FA0C1142B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1705268462345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746497173334729106E21A0646462B80E0542D7029CEDD233B68FD3A20A4FA45A7074939FA0C1142B8