Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 16:50:01 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43A9693488B3980E6430A36BEBED03765F4232C8123AECC44913D0C18EB2911D
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the US the 1st Amendment protects speech that some wish Law Enforcement would respond and "put an end to" Unless the speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” AND “likely to incite or produce such action" it is legal despite some's wishes https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brandenburg_test https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/ https://www.acluohio.org/en/cases/brandenburg-v-ohio-395-us-444-1969

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746497173334729106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43A9693488B3980E6430A36BEBED03765F4232C8123AECC44913D0C18EB2911D
  • createdAtMillis - 1705251001445
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174649717333472910643A9693488B3980E6430A36BEBED03765F4232C8123AECC44913D0C18EB2911D