Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 17:23:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0892D0AED0E7BB47C183D4FB6B7550445042B67510FA8AD325600FF6F5F09F94
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the US the 1st Amendment protects speech that some wish Law Enforcement would respond and "put an end to" Unless the speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” AND “likely to incite or produce such action" it is legal despite some's wishes https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brandenburg_test https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/ https://www.acluohio.org/en/cases/brandenburg-v-ohio-395-us-444-1969

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746497173334729106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0892D0AED0E7BB47C183D4FB6B7550445042B67510FA8AD325600FF6F5F09F94
  • createdAtMillis - 1705253002804
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17464971733347291060892D0AED0E7BB47C183D4FB6B7550445042B67510FA8AD325600FF6F5F09F94