Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 10:30:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 495CA7AAE7F30A08ECBB56AA5D69E507C3BB291742BFE7751DC29B37FFD9F94D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gegenteilig zur Behauptung in dem Foto hatte das Correctiv eine zentrale Rollen bei der Aufdeckung des CumEX-Skandals und der politischen Verstrickungen. https://correctiv.org/themen/cum-ex-steuerbetrug/ https://correctiv.org/top-stories/2021/10/21/cumex-files-2/ https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/CumEx-Files

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1746480075124412793
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 495CA7AAE7F30A08ECBB56AA5D69E507C3BB291742BFE7751DC29B37FFD9F94D
createdAtMillis - 1705401015353
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1746480075124412793495CA7AAE7F30A08ECBB56AA5D69E507C3BB291742BFE7751DC29B37FFD9F94D