Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 10:29:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA42DED82A3A3EA4AF8C5FBA8E5E3D7C3BB45BDA50BBD089CD54F97E35D938C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The current notes are irrelevant and should be downvoted. One just states chemical attacks occurred, but not by whom. The other focuses on a single investigation, which whistleblowers exposed to be biased, and misses much stronger evidence like this: https://twitter.com/Rootclaim/status/1405891184443199488

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746396267021000947
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA42DED82A3A3EA4AF8C5FBA8E5E3D7C3BB45BDA50BBD089CD54F97E35D938C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1705228182134
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746396267021000947CA42DED82A3A3EA4AF8C5FBA8E5E3D7C3BB45BDA50BBD089CD54F97E35D938C7