Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 06:53:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E005B4BE20A7AC0B8AE77EB26790EAF3EE438F7540E3345CECAC259C7145DD50
Participant Details

Original Note:

understandable that various ppl including some CN contributors would be unhappy with some CNs from time to time. More participation from users in CN will enhance the quality. It would be unfair to call CN biased if it doesn’t agree with one’s worldview https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746367211252683090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E005B4BE20A7AC0B8AE77EB26790EAF3EE438F7540E3345CECAC259C7145DD50
  • createdAtMillis - 1705215205364
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1746367211252683090E005B4BE20A7AC0B8AE77EB26790EAF3EE438F7540E3345CECAC259C7145DD50