Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 23:03:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94
Participant Details

Original Note:

understandable that various ppl including some CN contributors would be unhappy with some CNs from time to time. More participation from users in CN will enhance the quality. It would be unfair to call CN biased if it doesn’t agree with one’s worldview https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746367211252683090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94
  • createdAtMillis - 1705273381969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174636721125268309000F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94