Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 03:52:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C72BBD11473BE1D2CCE5588594998A92D194DF772159481033C81EBCA7B2887
Participant Details

Original Note:

この政治家の発言の根拠となっている片親疎外は似非科学であり、医学的根拠はありません。 国連人権理事会に提出された報告書においても、こうした概念は批判されています。 https://www.hurights.or.jp/archives/newsinbrief-ja/section4/2023/07/623.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746333412783448244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C72BBD11473BE1D2CCE5588594998A92D194DF772159481033C81EBCA7B2887
  • createdAtMillis - 1705204335140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17463334127834482447C72BBD11473BE1D2CCE5588594998A92D194DF772159481033C81EBCA7B2887