Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 00:52:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0F9942F0E014A1F50011EE4D33EB9C589760019E754124D44ABDD886CCFC3C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Not a single source provided is reliable. Experts and high ranking officials have debunked these claims and there is no evidence to suggest that the election was stolen.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746320046916259964
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0F9942F0E014A1F50011EE4D33EB9C589760019E754124D44ABDD886CCFC3C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1705193563351
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746320046916259964D0F9942F0E014A1F50011EE4D33EB9C589760019E754124D44ABDD886CCFC3C8