Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 09:01:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E36A99CD0337E93F312D2B0F31EAF9AE2FE0B4FD9CED83287C817E003B6727E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Not a single source provided is reliable. Experts and high ranking officials have debunked these claims and there is no evidence to suggest that the election was stolen.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746320046916259964
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E36A99CD0337E93F312D2B0F31EAF9AE2FE0B4FD9CED83287C817E003B6727E
  • createdAtMillis - 1705222866225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17463200469162599641E36A99CD0337E93F312D2B0F31EAF9AE2FE0B4FD9CED83287C817E003B6727E