Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 14:29:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAD6BC0687026B11CFA36694436B6ACFFA03CF0EEAB1193F1798B50FAB4CF318
Participant Details

Original Note:

Capel heeft de studies blijkbaar niet verder gelezen dan de abstracts, want een steekproef uit de 40 artikelen die geen hcq in de titel hebben staan laat zien dat hydroxychloroquine wel degelijk in het volledige artikel staat. https://twitter.com/pjvanerp/status/1746135013630833125

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746165215656301031
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DAD6BC0687026B11CFA36694436B6ACFFA03CF0EEAB1193F1798B50FAB4CF318
  • createdAtMillis - 1705156180924
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746165215656301031DAD6BC0687026B11CFA36694436B6ACFFA03CF0EEAB1193F1798B50FAB4CF318