Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 13:51:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38
Participant Details

Original Note:

Capel heeft de studies blijkbaar niet verder gelezen dan de abstracts, want een steekproef uit de 40 artikelen die geen hcq in de titel hebben staan laat zien dat hydroxychloroquine wel degelijk in het volledige artikel staat. https://twitter.com/pjvanerp/status/1746135013630833125

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746165215656301031
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38
  • createdAtMillis - 1705326693499
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174616521565630103159138A5AF711F1610E9F7DF12303E68B953C5A5D398308B12425323F60B57F38