Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 23:47:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD366D203EBE5E76EA81E562199FC816BAF31F1AB7F727566666C00284B7F1EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La juez del caso declaró “se concluye que existe duda sobre la ocurrencia o no de la conjunción carnal" La existencia de violencia sexual y el tecnicismo que levantó los cargos son declaraciones de los abogados de la demandante. El post y la nota, expresan opiniones

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746163089228050700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD366D203EBE5E76EA81E562199FC816BAF31F1AB7F727566666C00284B7F1EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1705189623661
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746163089228050700BD366D203EBE5E76EA81E562199FC816BAF31F1AB7F727566666C00284B7F1EB