Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 00:18:37 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 190A83FA93B61CEFDEA31EFA2829C955DDF7B27B720227F163FEFF92ABF45A2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La juez del caso declaró “se concluye que existe duda sobre la ocurrencia o no de la conjunción carnal" La existencia de violencia sexual y el tecnicismo que levantó los cargos son declaraciones de los abogados de la demandante. El post y la nota, expresan opiniones

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746163089228050700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 190A83FA93B61CEFDEA31EFA2829C955DDF7B27B720227F163FEFF92ABF45A2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1705191517796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746163089228050700190A83FA93B61CEFDEA31EFA2829C955DDF7B27B720227F163FEFF92ABF45A2A