Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 22:35:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED3D94F4F3FAAC718BF3F214A482F75DF5BAE8746EB83026DB09FB4D8DF7562F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court of Appeal judgment in Seema Misra’s appeal makes plain that she was prosecuted by the Post Office (then Royal Mail Group), not the CPS. See paragraph 4 of the linked judgement. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2021/577.html This has been confirmed by Seema Misra’s barrister: https://twitter.com/edwardhenry1/status/1745706045211591026

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746122384736760090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED3D94F4F3FAAC718BF3F214A482F75DF5BAE8746EB83026DB09FB4D8DF7562F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705185350824
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746122384736760090ED3D94F4F3FAAC718BF3F214A482F75DF5BAE8746EB83026DB09FB4D8DF7562F