Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 14:31:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEE5225648837F9190B9A22DA2AF42B6D678079669ECEAE15070285F84CDB619
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This tweet is this persons own interpretation of Israel’s argument regarding the International Court of Justice case brought against Israel by South Africa. The informtation about the case and current arguments can be found here on the ICJ’s website: https://www.icj-cij.org/index.php/case/192

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746039178276552984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEE5225648837F9190B9A22DA2AF42B6D678079669ECEAE15070285F84CDB619
  • createdAtMillis - 1705156267182
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746039178276552984CEE5225648837F9190B9A22DA2AF42B6D678079669ECEAE15070285F84CDB619