Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 16:31:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BA10B99F8F219B261DD827520080316B9455AEC6CFE01CFA6CE53A7250EE839C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This tweet is this persons own interpretation of Israel’s argument regarding the International Court of Justice case brought against Israel by South Africa. The informtation about the case and current arguments can be found here on the ICJ’s website: https://www.icj-cij.org/index.php/case/192

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746039178276552984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BA10B99F8F219B261DD827520080316B9455AEC6CFE01CFA6CE53A7250EE839C
  • createdAtMillis - 1705163501988
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746039178276552984BA10B99F8F219B261DD827520080316B9455AEC6CFE01CFA6CE53A7250EE839C