Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 14:23:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8109F4A99C4D0240F28496FDF160BDFACE0D72E76023FCF6D3457FE0B7DA3E12
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This tweet is this persons own interpretation of Israel’s argument regarding the International Court of Justice case brought against Israel by South Africa. The informtation about the case and current arguments can be found here on the ICJ’s website: https://www.icj-cij.org/index.php/case/192

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746039178276552984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8109F4A99C4D0240F28496FDF160BDFACE0D72E76023FCF6D3457FE0B7DA3E12
  • createdAtMillis - 1705155837107
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17460391782765529848109F4A99C4D0240F28496FDF160BDFACE0D72E76023FCF6D3457FE0B7DA3E12