Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 22:52:57 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 599ADFE09C600AA19A538103CB5F786482F686E1901B196B41FDB2C1711BDA5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is almost certainly an edited image. https://x.com/BackwardsFeet/status/1745922974606041410 There is no evidence that The New York Times (NYT) front-page showed this text, nor that NYT has ever used the OpenAI API (or any AI service) to summarize articles.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745931089707782509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 599ADFE09C600AA19A538103CB5F786482F686E1901B196B41FDB2C1711BDA5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1705099977476
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745931089707782509599ADFE09C600AA19A538103CB5F786482F686E1901B196B41FDB2C1711BDA5D