Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 10:19:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07F4A11F6E47B386D96569BE592094E2B97ECBB5DC52A24203908C78A4DD2D20
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is almost certainly an edited image. https://x.com/BackwardsFeet/status/1745922974606041410 There is no evidence that The New York Times (NYT) front-page showed this text, nor that NYT has ever used the OpenAI API (or any AI service) to summarize articles.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745931089707782509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07F4A11F6E47B386D96569BE592094E2B97ECBB5DC52A24203908C78A4DD2D20
  • createdAtMillis - 1705141183778
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174593108970778250907F4A11F6E47B386D96569BE592094E2B97ECBB5DC52A24203908C78A4DD2D20