Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 09:38:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 295AF28EB6499C2573590745468F6043D9C229035B8A16648384BB414163FE9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed CN provides links to different sets of data. As the OP points out, there has been no substantive attempt to debate the specifics of his work. As such, the proposed CN adds nothing of value to the argument and serves only to prove the OP’s point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745928132882780202
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 295AF28EB6499C2573590745468F6043D9C229035B8A16648384BB414163FE9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1705138719709
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745928132882780202295AF28EB6499C2573590745468F6043D9C229035B8A16648384BB414163FE9E