Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 22:35:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10FAB9B553518A9C6FFF9ACB0373C54E1E985EDAFFB8BA79AFE01136B1B18727
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed CN provides links to different sets of data. As the OP points out, there has been no substantive attempt to debate the specifics of his work. As such, the proposed CN adds nothing of value to the argument and serves only to prove the OP’s point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745928132882780202
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10FAB9B553518A9C6FFF9ACB0373C54E1E985EDAFFB8BA79AFE01136B1B18727
  • createdAtMillis - 1705098903762
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174592813288278020210FAB9B553518A9C6FFF9ACB0373C54E1E985EDAFFB8BA79AFE01136B1B18727